Michel v. State

12 Tex. Ct. App. 108
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 1882·Published

Opinion

Hurt, J.

The appellants were convicted of obstructing a public road. The road had been used as a public road about twelve years. In 1876 this road was classified as a public road of the second class, by the commissioners of Comal county, and has been known for two or three years as the Mountain Selma road, and has been worked by the hands in the neighborhood as a public road. No order of the County Court establishing such road was shown in evidence.

Can a road be shown to be a public road only by the production of an order of the County Court establishing it as such ? This precise question was presented in the case of McWhorter v. State, 43 Texas, 666, and in that case it was held that, as the road had long been used as a public road and had been recognized as such by order [109] of the court apportioning hands to work it, these facts were sufficient evidence to establish the fact that it was a public road, independent of an order of the court to that effect.

There are a number of bills of exception and assignments of error, none of which we deem of sufficient importance to require a further notice. We find no error in the judgment, and it is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michel v. State, 12 Tex. Ct. App. 108 (Tex. Ct. App. 1882).

12 Tex. Ct. App. 108 (Michel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McWhorter v. State
43 Tex. 666 (Texas Supreme Court, 1875)