Michel v. Bilyk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Michel v. Bilyk

894 S.W.2d 253, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 394, 1995 WL 95023

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 7, 1995·No. No. 65932·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the trial court’s modification of the custody provisions of an October 5, 1990 dissolution decree. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the [254]*254reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the trial court’s modification of the custody provisions of an October 5, 1990 dissolution decree. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the [254]*254reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Michel v. Bilyk, 894 S.W.2d 253, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 394, 1995 WL 95023 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

894 S.W.2d 253 (Michel v. Bilyk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.