Michel Cosmetics, Inc. v. Tsirkas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Michel Cosmetics, Inc. v. Tsirkas

262 A.D. 858, 28 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6268

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 858 (Michel Cosmetics, Inc. v. Tsirkas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michel Cosmetics, Inc. v. Tsirkas, 262 A.D. 858, 28 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for an injunction, an accounting, and to recover damages for unfair competition. Appeal from an order referring the issues to an official referee to hear and report dismissed, without costs. Such order is not appealable. (Matter of Silaski, 175 App. Div. 199; Luttenberger v. Alpert Woodworking Corp., 252 id. 862; Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Madgo Realty Corp., 256 id. 954.) It would seem, however, that the hearing should be conducted toward the end directed by the opinion in this ease in 282 N. Y. 195, and not in accordance with the wording of the order, which refers to the provision in the interlocutory judgment, paragraph 4 of which states a measure of damages which has been disapproved. The order of reference could be resettled accordingly. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for an injunction, an accounting, and to recover damages for unfair competition. Appeal from an order referring the issues to an official referee to hear and report dismissed, without costs. Such order is not appealable. (Matter of Silaski, 175 App. Div. 199; Luttenberger v. Alpert Woodworking Corp., 252 id. 862; Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Madgo Realty Corp., 256 id. 954.) It would seem, however, that the hearing should be conducted toward the end directed by the opinion in this ease in 282 N. Y. 195, and not in accordance with the wording of the order, which refers to the provision in the interlocutory judgment, paragraph 4 of which states a measure of damages which has been disapproved. The order of reference could be resettled accordingly. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 858, 28 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michel-cosmetics-inc-v-tsirkas-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack