Micheal Anthony Paiz v. State
Opinion
Order filed February 11, 2020
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-18-00756-CR
MICHEAL ANTHONY PAIZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 248th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1575130
ORDER
Appellant’s appointed counsel, Terrence A. Gaiser, filed a brief concluding the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). On January 16, 2020, we informed counsel that to comply with the requirements set forth in Anders, a Motion to Withdraw as counsel for appellant must be filed.
As of this date, no response has been filed. Accordingly, we order counsel to file a motion to withdraw within 10 days of the date of this order. If counsel fails to comply, his brief may be stricken and the appeal abated for appointment of new counsel.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Micheal Anthony Paiz v. State (Micheal Anthony Paiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.