Micheal Anthony Paiz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 11, 2020·No. 14-18-00756-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed February 11, 2020

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00756-CR

MICHEAL ANTHONY PAIZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1575130

ORDER

Appellant’s appointed counsel, Terrence A. Gaiser, filed a brief concluding the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). On January 16, 2020, we informed counsel that to comply with the requirements set forth in Anders, a Motion to Withdraw as counsel for appellant must be filed.

As of this date, no response has been filed. Accordingly, we order counsel to file a motion to withdraw within 10 days of the date of this order. If counsel fails to comply, his brief may be stricken and the appeal abated for appointment of new counsel.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Micheal Anthony Paiz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Micheal Anthony Paiz v. State (Micheal Anthony Paiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)