Michaud v. Fletcher-Lahey Co.
This text of 86 A. 1102 (Michaud v. Fletcher-Lahey Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court are of opinion:
1. That the evidence not only does not support the plaintiff’s theory as to 'how his intestate was injured', but flatly contradicts it.
2. That the defendant did not owe the plaintiff’s intestate the duty of warning him of danger at the place where he was injured.
3. That a verdict should have been directed for the defendant. Motion and exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 A. 1102, 110 Me. 547, 1913 Me. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michaud-v-fletcher-lahey-co-me-1913.