Michalowski v. Ellish

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Michalowski v. Ellish

29 A.D.2d 948, 290 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4335

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 948 (Michalowski v. Ellish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michalowski v. Ellish, 29 A.D.2d 948, 290 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated November 4, 1967, which denied plaintiff’s motion to remove the action to said court from the County Court, County of Rockland, modified on the law and the facts by adding a provision that the denial is without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon proper papers. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion plaintiff should be permitted an opportunity to submit a medical affidavit which specifies the injuries and their causal relationship to the accident. Plaintiff should also supply whatever documentary proof he has to substantiate his claim of lost earnings. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated November 4, 1967, which denied plaintiff’s motion to remove the action to said court from the County Court, County of Rockland, modified on the law and the facts by adding a provision that the denial is without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon proper papers. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion plaintiff should be permitted an opportunity to submit a medical affidavit which specifies the injuries and their causal relationship to the accident. Plaintiff should also supply whatever documentary proof he has to substantiate his claim of lost earnings. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 948, 290 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michalowski-v-ellish-nyappdiv-1968.