Michailowski v. McVicker
This text of 958 So. 2d 584 (Michailowski v. McVicker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s finding of contempt for appellant’s failure to comply with the final judgment. We agree with appellant, however, that the portion of the order awarding attorney’s fees was error because there are no findings in the order to support the basis for entitlement or the amount. See, e.g., Beck [585]*585v. Beck, 852 So.2d 934 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Saporito v. Saporito, 831 So.2d 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Maas v. Maas, 541 So.2d 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
958 So. 2d 584, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9594, 2007 WL 1789265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michailowski-v-mcvicker-fladistctapp-2007.