Michaelyan v. Eassa
This text of 38 So. 2d 304 (Michaelyan v. Eassa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question presented on this appeal is whether the evidence, when considered as a whole, establishes a sale or a conditional sale of some oriental rugs. We have studied the record, examined the briefs of counsel and heard oral argument *Page 305 at the bar of this Court. We fail to find error in the record.
Affirmed.
TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and CHAPMAN, HOBSON and BROWN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 So. 2d 304, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michaelyan-v-eassa-fla-1949.