Michaelson Et Ux. v. Natl. Bk. of Commerce

Supreme Court of Florida

Michaelson Et Ux. v. Natl. Bk. of Commerce

136 So. 647, 102 Fla. 678

DecidedJuly 31, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 136 So. 647 (Michaelson Et Ux. v. Natl. Bk. of Commerce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michaelson Et Ux. v. Natl. Bk. of Commerce, 136 So. 647, 102 Fla. 678 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Appellee, National Bank of Commerce, brought suit in equity to foreclose a mortgage, naming appellant and other appellees as parties defendant. A special master was appointed to take testimony and make finding of law and fact. Such findings were reported and exceptions thereto were overruled. A motion to dismiss the amended bill of complaint and a motion to require certain counsel to retire as representative of different defendants with alleged adverse interests were also overruled and appeal taken from all of said decrees.

All errors assigned have been examined carefully. An opinion discussing them would be lengthy and would serve no useful purpose. The decree of the Chancellor is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. *680 Buford, O.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— Appellee, National Bank of Commerce, brought suit in equity to foreclose a mortgage, naming appellant and other appellees as parties defendant. A special master was appointed to take testimony and make finding of law and fact. Such findings were reported and exceptions thereto were overruled. A motion to dismiss the amended bill of complaint and a motion to require certain counsel to retire as representative of different defendants with alleged adverse interests were also overruled and appeal taken from all of said decrees.

All errors assigned have been examined carefully. An opinion discussing them would be lengthy and would serve no useful purpose. The decree of the Chancellor is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. *680 Buford, O.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 So. 647, 102 Fla. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michaelson-et-ux-v-natl-bk-of-commerce-fla-1931.