Michael's School of Dance, Language & Charm, Inc. v. Broward National Bank of Fort Lauderdale

320 So. 2d 413, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15418
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 17, 1975
DocketNo. 74-1038
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 320 So. 2d 413 (Michael's School of Dance, Language & Charm, Inc. v. Broward National Bank of Fort Lauderdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael's School of Dance, Language & Charm, Inc. v. Broward National Bank of Fort Lauderdale, 320 So. 2d 413, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15418 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinions

MORROW, R. O., Associate Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Michael’s School of Dance & Charm, Inc., brought suit against Broward National Bank, as representative of the Olive Rankin Estate for services rendered. The president of Michael’s entered an affidavit that she was the major stockholder, kept the records, and observed decedent taking dancing lessons and that the deceased had received 1,283 hours of dance lessons, for which she owed $20 an hour. The court granted the bank’s motion for final summary judgment on the grounds that “Plaintiff will be barred from making out a prima facie case by virtue of the Dead Man’s Rule.”

Two questions are raised. First, that it was error to grant a summary judgment based on the Dead Man’s Rule; and second, that plaintiff failed to bring an action upon its claim within thirty days from the service of an objection thereto upon it. Fla.Stat. 733.705 (Supp.1974).

The affidavit in objection to the motion for summary judgment in this case does not preclude the showing of any other genuine issue of a material fact. It was error to assume such, in this case, harmless error. However, the above cited statute of limitation is effective in that there is no showing in the record that any extension of time was granted or applied for within [414]*414which to bring an action upon plaintiff’s claim.

Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, J., concurs. DOWNEY, J., specially concurs, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jarzem v. Bierhaus
415 So. 2d 88 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
320 So. 2d 413, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michaels-school-of-dance-language-charm-inc-v-broward-national-bank-fladistctapp-1975.