Michael Zemonick v. Consolidation Coal Company, a Corporation
775 F.2d 1157, 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2088
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Michael Zemonick v. Consolidation Coal Company, a Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 762 F.2d 381 →
Opinion
ORDER
It appears that upon a poll of the court upon the suggestion of a rehearing en banc that Judges Widener, Phillips, Sprouse, Ervin and Chapman, a majority of the judges in regular active service, have voted for it and that Chief Judge Winter and Judge Wilkinson did not vote because of disqualification.
IT IS NOW ORDERED that the case be reheard en banc.
The parties will be permitted to file supplemental briefs upon a schedule to be established by the Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Zemonick v. Consolidation Coal Company, a Corporation, 775 F.2d 1157, 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2088 (4th Cir. 1985).
775 F.2d 1157 (Michael Zemonick v. Consolidation Coal Company, a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.