Michael Webb v. D. Sisto
This text of 384 F. App'x 649 (Michael Webb v. D. Sisto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
Petitioner Michael Webb appeals the order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Webb concedes that he filed his notice of appeal thirty-one days after the district court entered judgment. A notice of appeal in a civil case “must be filed with the district clerk within 30 days after the judgment or order appealed from is entered.” Fed R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). “An appeal from a denial of habeas petition is considered a ‘civil’ matter and is thus subject to the time limitations set forth in rule 4(a)” of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Malone v. Avenenti, 850 F.2d 569, 571 (9th Cir.1988). Rule 4(a) “is both mandatory and jurisdictional” because “Congress ... specifically limited our jurisdiction to hear civil appeals at 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a), which codifies the same time constraints on the filing of civil appeals ... that exist in Rule 4(a).” United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir.2007) (emphasis removed). We “must dismiss civil appeals *650 that are untimely for lack of jurisdiction ....” Id.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
384 F. App'x 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-webb-v-d-sisto-ca9-2010.