Michael Wayne Osborne v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 7, 2019·No. 09-19-00173-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-19-00173-CR

MICHAEL WAYNE OSBORNE, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19-31505

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 5, 2019, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant filed a response, but he failed to articulate a valid basis for jurisdiction in that response.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court has signed an order that is appealable at this time. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless such jurisdiction is expressly granted by statute). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on August 6, 2019 Opinion Delivered August 7, 2019 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Wayne Osborne v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Michael Wayne Osborne v. State (Michael Wayne Osborne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKown v. State
915 S.W.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)