Michael Wayne Osborne v. State
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
NO. 09-19-00173-CR
MICHAEL WAYNE OSBORNE, Appellant V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 19-31505
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 5, 2019, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant filed a response, but he failed to articulate a valid basis for jurisdiction in that response.
Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court has signed an order that is appealable at this time. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless such jurisdiction is expressly granted by statute). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HOLLIS HORTON
Justice
Submitted on August 6, 2019 Opinion Delivered August 7, 2019 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Wayne Osborne v. State (Michael Wayne Osborne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.