Michael Wayne Osborne v. State
This text of Michael Wayne Osborne v. State (Michael Wayne Osborne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-19-00173-CR __________________
MICHAEL WAYNE OSBORNE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19-31505 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 5, 2019, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent
from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want
of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the
appeal. Appellant filed a response, but he failed to articulate a valid basis for
jurisdiction in that response.
1 Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court has signed an order that
is appealable at this time. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—
Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack
jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless such jurisdiction is expressly
granted by statute). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
_________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice
Submitted on August 6, 2019 Opinion Delivered August 7, 2019 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Wayne Osborne v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-wayne-osborne-v-state-texapp-2019.