Michael Wayne Long v. John Healey, Marine Recruiter Staff Sargent Steinbird and United States Marine Corps Commandant

810 F.2d 202, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33204, 1986 WL 16211
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 5, 1986
Docket86-5887
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 810 F.2d 202 (Michael Wayne Long v. John Healey, Marine Recruiter Staff Sargent Steinbird and United States Marine Corps Commandant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Wayne Long v. John Healey, Marine Recruiter Staff Sargent Steinbird and United States Marine Corps Commandant, 810 F.2d 202, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33204, 1986 WL 16211 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

810 F.2d 202

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Michael Wayne LONG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John HEALEY, Marine Recruiter; Staff Sargent Steinbird;
and United States Marine Corps Commandant,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-5887.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 5, 1986.

Before KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the motion for counsel and the record, plaintiff having declined to submit a timely informal brief, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff seeks an upgraded military discharge with attendant veteran's benefits. The district court dismissed the cause without prejudice pending exhaustion of remedies provided for in 10 U.S.C. §§ 1552 and 1553. Plaintiff appealed and moved for the appointment of appellate counsel.

Upon examination of the record we affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court.

It appearing therefore that the question on which decision of the cause depends is so unsubstantial as not to need further argument, Rule 9(d)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel be denied and that the final order of the district court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 F.2d 202, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33204, 1986 WL 16211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-wayne-long-v-john-healey-marine-recruiter--ca6-1986.