MICHAEL WATERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 4, 2020
Docket19-4431
StatusPublished

This text of MICHAEL WATERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (MICHAEL WATERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MICHAEL WATERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL WATERS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-4431 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed September 4, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William D. Sites, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.

Michael Waters appeals the order revoking his probation and the sentence

imposed upon revocation. Just as we did in case number 2D19-33, we affirm in all

respects but remand for correction of a scrivener's error pertaining to count two in the

underlying sentencing documents. Despite the trial court's oral pronouncement that Waters' sentence on

count two was a five-year term of probation consecutive to the ten-year prison term on

count three, the written sentencing documents incorrectly reflect a split sentence on

count two of five years' imprisonment followed by five years' probation. Consequently,

we remand with instructions for correction of the written sentencing documents to

comport with the trial court's oral pronouncement. See Bryant v. State, 45 Fla. L.

Weekly D520b, D520b (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 6, 2020) ("When a conflict exists between the

trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence and the written sentencing documents, the

oral pronouncement controls." (citing Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603 (Fla.

2007))).

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
957 So. 2d 600 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MICHAEL WATERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-waters-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.