Michael Wade Blue v. State
This text of Michael Wade Blue v. State (Michael Wade Blue v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-17-00265-CR NO. 02-17-00266-CR NO. 02-17-00267-CR
MICHAEL WADE BLUE APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. CR15-0396, CR15-0397, CR15-0398
ORDER
Appellant Michael Wade Blue’s brief was originally due January 8, 2018.
This court has granted three previous extensions of time to file appellant’s brief.
On April 11, 2018, in granting appellant’s “Third Motion for Extension of Time in
Which to File Appellant’s Brief,” we ordered the brief due on May 9, 2018, and we
stated in our order that NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WOULD BE GRANTED.
Appellant has not filed a brief.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the Hon. David A. Pearson, IV, appointed
counsel for appellant, file an appellate brief with this court on behalf of appellant FILE COPY
on or before Monday, June 4, 2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME
FOR FILING APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. If the brief is not filed
by Monday, June 4, 2018, appellant’s counsel may be required to show cause
why he should not be held in contempt of court for failing to file a timely brief.
Failure to timely comply with this order will result in this case being abated
and remanded to the trial court (A) to conduct a hearing to determine (1) whether
the appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, (2) why appointed counsel has not
filed a brief and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal, (3) the exact date
that counsel will file a brief on appellant’s behalf in the court of appeals or
whether substitute counsel should be appointed to represent appellant, and (4)
whether appellant desires to proceed pro se; (B) to appoint substitute counsel if
necessary; and (C) to make findings for the purpose of aiding this court in
determining whether to initiate contempt proceedings against the Hon. David A.
Pearson, IV. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2)–(4).
The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the
attorneys of record, the trial court clerk, the court reporter, and the trial court
judge.
DATED May 24, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Wade Blue v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-wade-blue-v-state-texapp-2018.