Michael W. Schleeper v. Purina Benefits Association, a Trust

170 F.3d 1157, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4917, 1999 WL 157637
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 24, 1999·No. 98-3127·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this ERISA case, the issue is whether the employee-beneficiary failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by not filing a timely intra-plan appeal. The District Court 1 held the claim barred by failure to exhaust. We affirm.

Plaintiff argues exhaustion would have been futile. But no evidence to support this claim was adduced, and we are unwilling to assume futility. Plaintiff points out that he had already obtained one level of intra-plan review, and that his failure, if any, related only to a second level of intra-plan review. The law does not forbid an intra-plan appellate structure containing two levels.

Affirmed.

1

. The Hon. Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael W. Schleeper v. Purina Benefits Association, a Trust, 170 F.3d 1157, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4917, 1999 WL 157637 (8th Cir. 1999).

170 F.3d 1157 (Michael W. Schleeper v. Purina Benefits Association, a Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Natta v. Sara Lee Corp.
439 F. Supp. 2d 911 (N.D. Iowa, 2006)
Theresa Wert v. Liberty Life
Eighth Circuit, 2006