Michael Valan, Iii, Richard Alexander v. Gerald T. McFaul Bruce Stafford
This text of 819 F.2d 290 (Michael Valan, Iii, Richard Alexander v. Gerald T. McFaul Bruce Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Michael VALAN, III, Plaintiff,
Richard Alexander, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gerald T. MCFAUL; Bruce Stafford, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-3807.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 22, 1987.
Before KENNEDY, RYAN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Plaintiff initiated this action on August 2, 1985 in the district court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to discriminatory treatment and ultimately discharged from his job by defendants on November 22, 1983, without equal protection or due process of law. The district court determined that plaintiff's complaint was not timely and dismissed the case on July 28, 1986. This appeal followed.
In Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 2901 (1986), this court held that Ohio's one-year statute of limitations applicable to personal injury actions, Ohio Rev. Code Ann. SS 2305.11, governs actions brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Plaintiff does not dispute that all of his claims arose on or before the date of his discharge on November 22, 1983. The district court, accordingly, correctly determined that plaintiff's action was barred because it was not filed within one year after the alleged cause of action arose. See Jones v. Shankland, 800 F.2d 77, 80 (6th Cir. 1986); Mulligan, 777 F.2d 340.
Therefore, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed., Rule 9(b)(2), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
819 F.2d 290, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6679, 1987 WL 36018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-valan-iii-richard-alexander-v-gerald-t-mcf-ca6-1987.