Michael v. United States

396 F. App'x 936
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2010·No. No. 10-6816·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Michael seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice some claims in Michael’s complaint and directing the Defendant to respond to the remaining claims in the complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Michael seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Michael’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael v. United States, 396 F. App'x 936 (4th Cir. 2010).

396 F. App'x 936 (Michael v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)