Michael v. State

35 So. 3d 1023, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7634, 2010 WL 2178744

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Anthony Michael appeals his judgments and sentences for possession of cocaine, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. He challenges the trial court’s finding that he was competent to proceed to trial. We affirm Michael’s judgments and sentences without comment. However, because the trial court did not enter a written order on its oral finding of competency, we remand this case solely for entry of a written order finding Michael competent to proceed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.212(b); Hampton v. State, 4 So.3d 789, 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed and remanded.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.