Michael v. Reliance Natl. Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Michael v. Reliance Natl. Ins. Co.

2001 Ohio 78, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1262

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 16, 2001

Docket2000-1323

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 78 (Michael v. Reliance Natl. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael v. Reliance Natl. Ins. Co., 2001 Ohio 78, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1262 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 1262.]

MICHAEL, SUCCESSOR ADMR., APPELLANT, v. RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Michael v. Reliance Natl. Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio-78.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-1323—Submitted March 28, 2001—Decided May 16, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1002. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} Because I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, I respectfully dissent. MOYER, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Lamkin, Van Eman, Trimble, Beals & Rourke and Michael J. Rourke, for appellant. Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder & Bringardner Co., L.P.A., Jay B. Eggspuehler and Samuel M. Pipino, for appellee. Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 1262.]

MICHAEL, SUCCESSOR ADMR., APPELLANT, v. RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Michael v. Reliance Natl. Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio-78.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-1323—Submitted March 28, 2001—Decided May 16, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1002. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} Because I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, I respectfully dissent. MOYER, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Lamkin, Van Eman, Trimble, Beals & Rourke and Michael J. Rourke, for appellant. Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder & Bringardner Co., L.P.A., Jay B. Eggspuehler and Samuel M. Pipino, for appellee. Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 78, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-v-reliance-natl-ins-co-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack