Michael v. Reading Co.

Third Circuit

Michael v. Reading Co.

174 F.2d 828, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2286

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 9, 1949

DocketNo. 9877

StatusPublished

This text of 174 F.2d 828 (Michael v. Reading Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael v. Reading Co., 174 F.2d 828, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2286 (3d Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question raised by the appellant in this case is whether there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s negligence to support the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff. We agree with the district court, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge McGranery denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, 82 F.Supp. 54, that the evidence was sufficient.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole question raised by the appellant in this case is whether there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s negligence to support the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff. We agree with the district court, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge McGranery denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, 82 F.Supp. 54, that the evidence was sufficient.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 F.2d 828, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-v-reading-co-ca3-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack