Michael v. . McIntyre

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Michael v. . McIntyre

67 S.E. 68, 151 N.C. 392, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 285

DecidedDecember 1, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 68 (Michael v. . McIntyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael v. . McIntyre, 67 S.E. 68, 151 N.C. 392, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 285 (N.C. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oitriam :

Upon an examination of the record, we are of opinion that the three exceptions to the ruling of the court below excluding certain evidence of the plaintiff, Michael, and of the witness, 'Pape, are without merit, as the evidence had no bearing upon the issue raised by the pleadings.

¥e are of opinion that there is no sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations of conspiracy to cheat and defraud.

We think, upon examining all the evidence, that the motion to nonsuit was properly allowed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Oitriam :

Upon an examination of the record, we are of opinion that the three exceptions to the ruling of the court below excluding certain evidence of the plaintiff, Michael, and of the witness, 'Pape, are without merit, as the evidence had no bearing upon the issue raised by the pleadings.

¥e are of opinion that there is no sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations of conspiracy to cheat and defraud.

We think, upon examining all the evidence, that the motion to nonsuit was properly allowed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.E. 68, 151 N.C. 392, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-v-mcintyre-nc-1909.