Michael v. Greenberg

116 A. 923, 97 Conn. 737, 1922 Conn. LEXIS 131

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is confined to a correction of the finding. The first eight assignments of error do not follow our practice; the last six assignments, while not in the most approved form, cannot be said to be void assignments. We have examined the evidence and find no one of the assignments well taken, assuming all were in due form. The appeal seems to us to present no reviewable question.

There is no error.