Michael v. Costello v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Michael v. Costello v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

528 F.2d 1381

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 1976

Docket75--2392

StatusPublished

This text of 528 F.2d 1381 (Michael v. Costello v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael v. Costello v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, 528 F.2d 1381 (5th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

528 F.2d 1381

Michael V. COSTELLO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75--2392.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

March 3, 1976.

Donna H. Stinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Civ. Div., Jerry Oxner, Chief Trial Counsel, Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., Raymond W. Gearey, Atty. for Fla. Div. of Corrections, Tallahassee, Fla., John A. Barley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Civ. Div., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Tobias Simon, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for plaintiff-appellee.

Brian K. Landsberg, William C. Graves, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion January 15, 1976, 5 Cir., 1976, 525 F.2d 1239).

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, WISDOM, GEWIN, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

It is ordered that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

528 F.2d 1381

Michael V. COSTELLO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75--2392.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

March 3, 1976.

Donna H. Stinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Civ. Div., Jerry Oxner, Chief Trial Counsel, Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., Raymond W. Gearey, Atty. for Fla. Div. of Corrections, Tallahassee, Fla., John A. Barley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Civ. Div., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Tobias Simon, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for plaintiff-appellee.

Brian K. Landsberg, William C. Graves, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion January 15, 1976, 5 Cir., 1976, 525 F.2d 1239).

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, WISDOM, GEWIN, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

It is ordered that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 F.2d 1381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-v-costello-v-louie-l-wainwright-director-division-of-ca5-1976.