Michael v. Board of Regents
This text of 15 Ct. Cl. 302 (Michael v. Board of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent’s Answer. Claimant is employed by West Virginia University. Due to an oversight, the payroll department of the University calculated that claimant’s yearly salary was $12,000, instead of the correct amount of $12,900. Claimant was therefore shorted $60 in her first payroll check. The respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity and amount of the claim and states that there were sufficient funds in the appropriate fiscal year from which the claim could have been paid.
In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount sought.
Award of $60.00.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ct. Cl. 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-v-board-of-regents-wvctcl-1985.