Michael Tremal Sanders v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 5, 2006
Docket06-05-00105-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Tremal Sanders v. State (Michael Tremal Sanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Tremal Sanders v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


______________________________


No. 06-05-00105-CR



MICHAEL SANDERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20577





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross



MEMORANDUM OPINION


            Michael Sanders, because he believed he did not get milk for breakfast, lost his temper, beat on the walls of his cell, and threw bodily fluids and feces on three jailers who were attempting to get him under control. A jury convicted him of the offense of harassment by a person in a correctional detention facility, with one prior conviction. The jury assessed his punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment.

          Sanders was tried in a single proceeding for committing the same offense against three different individuals during a single incident, Justin Foster, Sherri Halton, and Peggy Jimenez. He was convicted and was sentenced identically in each case. His sentences in these three cases were ordered to run concurrently, but the trial court ordered these punishments served consecutive to the punishment he was already serving. Sanders has filed joint briefs raising the same issues for all three appeals. In this case, the conviction for harassing Halton is at issue.

          Because the issues, facts, and contentions raised in this appeal are identical to those raised in our opinion issued this day in Sanders v. State, No. 06-05-00104-CR, for the reasons stated in that opinion, we likewise resolve the issues in this appeal in favor of the State.


          We affirm the judgment.

                                                                           Donald R. Ross

                                                                           Justice


Date Submitted:      December 6, 2005

Date Decided:         January 5, 2006


Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Tremal Sanders v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-tremal-sanders-v-state-texapp-2006.