Michael Thomas Paul v. Miguel Lopez, David Padilla, John Stricklin, Javier Zuniga, and San Antonio Television, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 4, 2019
Docket04-18-00831-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Thomas Paul v. Miguel Lopez, David Padilla, John Stricklin, Javier Zuniga, and San Antonio Television, LLC (Michael Thomas Paul v. Miguel Lopez, David Padilla, John Stricklin, Javier Zuniga, and San Antonio Television, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Thomas Paul v. Miguel Lopez, David Padilla, John Stricklin, Javier Zuniga, and San Antonio Television, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 4, 2019

No. 04-18-00831-CV

Michael Thomas PAUL, Appellants

v.

Miguel LOPEZ, David Padilla, John Stricklin, Javier Zuniga, and San Antonio Television, LLC, Appellees

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-2085-CV-A Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

ORDER On November 14, 2018, the trial court signed a final judgment. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. The clerk’s record and the reporter’s record were initially due in this court on December 28, 2018.

On December 17, 2018, appellant filed a statement of inability to pay court costs in this court. On January 16, 2019, the court reporter filed a contest challenging appellant’s statement of inability to pay court costs. On January 22, 2019, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on the court reporter’s contest. On February 28, 2019, the clerk’s record was filed.

The clerk’ record shows that the trial court attempted to hold a hearing in accordance with our January 22, 2019 order. The clerk’s record contains (1) the trial court’s notice setting a hearing, (2) the reporter’s record from the hearing, and (3) the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law state that appellant received notice of the hearing but failed to appear and that because appellant presented no evidence at the evidentiary hearing appellant is not indigent.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before March 15, 2019, that the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due on or before April 5, 2019, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). _________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of March, 2019.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Thomas Paul v. Miguel Lopez, David Padilla, John Stricklin, Javier Zuniga, and San Antonio Television, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-thomas-paul-v-miguel-lopez-david-padilla-john-stricklin-javier-texapp-2019.