Michael Thomas Crehan Suzanne Tetreault Crehan v. Mellon Mortgage Company

42 F.3d 1385, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39335, 1994 WL 689875
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 12, 1994
Docket93-2512
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 F.3d 1385 (Michael Thomas Crehan Suzanne Tetreault Crehan v. Mellon Mortgage Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Thomas Crehan Suzanne Tetreault Crehan v. Mellon Mortgage Company, 42 F.3d 1385, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39335, 1994 WL 689875 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

42 F.3d 1385

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Thomas CREHAN; Suzanne Tetreault Crehan, Plaintiffs
Appellants,
v.
MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-2512.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 8, 1994.
Decided Dec. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-93-1017-A)

Michael Thomas Crehan, Suzanne Tetreault Crehan, Appellants Pro Se.

John Martin Wood, Washington, D.C.; Jill Maria Lashay, REED, SMITH, SHAW & MCCLAY, McLean, VA, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's orders dismissing their action and denying their request to amend judgment and for leave to replead. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crehan v. Mellon Mortgage Co., No. CA-93-1017-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 19 & Nov. 22, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deboer v. Mellon Mortgage Company
64 F.3d 1171 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
DeBoer v. Mellon Mortgage Co.
64 F.3d 1171 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F.3d 1385, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39335, 1994 WL 689875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-thomas-crehan-suzanne-tetreault-crehan-v-mellon-mortgage-company-ca4-1994.