Michael T. Miscannon v. Robert H. Finch, as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

432 F.2d 88, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7097
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 1970
Docket18388_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 432 F.2d 88 (Michael T. Miscannon v. Robert H. Finch, as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael T. Miscannon v. Robert H. Finch, as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 432 F.2d 88, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7097 (3d Cir. 1970).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The district court refused to set aside a decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare that denied the appellant disability benefits on the ground that the claimant had not established eligibility within the applicable restrictive definition of “disability” enacted by Congress in sections 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act, as amended. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423.

The denial of disability benefits was based on the following findings by a hearing examiner:

******
“(4) The claimant has grade III silicosis, with little or no evidence of emphysema, which limits him to sedentary, light, or moderate work activity.
“(5) The claimant has the residual physical capacity and transferable skills to undertake positions of a sedentary, light, or moderate nature, on a sustained basis which exist in the local economy and which were enumerated by two vocational experts.
******
“(7) Claimant was not under a ‘disability’ as defined in the Act either prior to or after the Social Security Amendments of 1965, at any time prior to the issuance of this decision.”

We have examined the administrative record and, like the district court, find substantial evidence including unequivocal testimony of examining physicians, that amply supports the quoted decisive findings.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hofacker v. Weinberger
382 F. Supp. 572 (S.D. New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
432 F.2d 88, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-t-miscannon-v-robert-h-finch-as-secretary-of-health-education-ca3-1970.