Michael Sutton v. Octapharma Plasma Incorporated
Opinion
Order entered April 13, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-20-00018-CV
MICHAEL SUTTON, Appellant
V.
OCTAPHARMA PLASMA INCORPORATED, Appellee
On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-06879
ORDER
The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By order dated March 5, 2020,
we granted appellant’s request to extend time to file the clerk’s record so that
certain documents could be identified and filed under seal. We ordered the clerk’s
record to be filed by March 19, 2020. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed
and appellant has not further corresponded with the Court regarding the status of
the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within
TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the clerk’s record, or (2)
written verification that appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of
costs and has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We notify
appellant that if we receive verification he is not entitled to proceed without
payment of costs and has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s
record, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
37.3(b).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:
Felicia Pitre Dallas County District Clerk
All parties /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Sutton v. Octapharma Plasma Incorporated (Michael Sutton v. Octapharma Plasma Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.