Michael Stoll v. State of Florida
This text of Michael Stoll v. State of Florida (Michael Stoll v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-1661 LT Case No. 1994-CF-3303-B _____________________________
MICHAEL STOLL,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition to Invoke All Writs, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Michael Stoll, Raiford, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alyssa M. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.
March 14, 2025
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously denied on the merits in part and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to the remainder, Petitioner’s petition to invoke all writs stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 1994-CF-3303-B. Because it appears that Petitioner’s repeated motions and other filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2024); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITIONER WARNED.
MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Stoll v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-stoll-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.