Michael Smith v. Yates

559 F. App'x 625
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2014
Docket13-16947
StatusUnpublished

This text of 559 F. App'x 625 (Michael Smith v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Smith v. Yates, 559 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Lenoir Smith appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 F. App'x 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-smith-v-yates-ca9-2014.