Michael Shomate and Brianne Shomate v. Servis One, Inc. D/B/A BSI Financial Services
This text of Michael Shomate and Brianne Shomate v. Servis One, Inc. D/B/A BSI Financial Services (Michael Shomate and Brianne Shomate v. Servis One, Inc. D/B/A BSI Financial Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-26-00162-CV __________________
MICHAEL SHOMATE AND BRIANNE SHOMATE, Appellants
V.
SERVIS ONE, INC. D/B/A BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25-08-13306 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Michael Shomate and Brianne Shomate filed a notice of accelerated appeal
from the trial court’s Order on Motions Related to Discovery and Abatement signed
on March 27, 2026. We questioned whether the trial court signed a final judgment
or an interlocutory order that is appealable as an accelerated appeal. The clerk’s
record has been filed, and after reviewing the record, we conclude the record does
not contain a final appealable judgment or an interlocutory order that is appealable.
1 Appellants filed a response to the Clerk’s notice, but their response failed to identify
a statute that authorizes an accelerated appeal at this time.
Generally, in civil cases, appellate courts review only final judgments and
interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con
Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Tex. R. App. P. 28.1. We dismiss this appeal
for want of jurisdiction. 1 See id. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on May 20, 2026 Opinion Delivered May 21, 2026
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
1 We note that the Shomates separately filed a mandamus petition that the Clerk of the Court docketed as No. 09-26-00189-CV, In re Michael A. Shomate and Brianne K. Shomate. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Shomate and Brianne Shomate v. Servis One, Inc. D/B/A BSI Financial Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-shomate-and-brianne-shomate-v-servis-one-inc-dba-bsi-financial-txctapp9-2026.