Michael Shane Sanders v. State
This text of Michael Shane Sanders v. State (Michael Shane Sanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 9, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00224-CR ——————————— MICHAEL SHANE SANDERS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 68774
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Michael Shane Sanders, was convicted of unlawful possession of
a firearm. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 46.04(a) (West 2011). The trial court
assessed a sentence of five years’ imprisonment. Appellant timely filed a notice of
appeal. Because appellant has not filed a brief in this matter, this Court abated the
appeal and ordered the case remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine,
inter alia, whether appellant wished to prosecute this appeal.
The trial court set a hearing on our order of abatement for December 13,
2013. The reporter’s record of those proceedings has been filed in this Court as
well as a clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings.
At the hearing, appellant stated on the record in open court that he does not
wish to appeal this case. When further questioned by the trial court, appellant
stated that he understands that he has a right to appeal, but that he does not want to.
Finally, on the record, the trial court made a finding that appellant “do[es] not wish
to pursue this appeal.” This finding is also contained in the trial court’s written
findings of fact.
Appellant has not filed a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.2(a). However, based upon the trial court’s finding that appellant does
not want to continue his appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the
operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
Accordingly, we lift the abatement ordered by this Court on October 22,
2013, reinstate the appeal, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
2 Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Shane Sanders v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-shane-sanders-v-state-texapp-2014.