Michael Scott v. Warden William Walker
This text of Michael Scott v. Warden William Walker (Michael Scott v. Warden William Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-06-0011-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
JUNE 28, 2006
______________________________
MICHAEL SCOTT, TDCJ-ID NO. 683064, APPELLANT
V.
WARDEN WILLIAM WALKER, ET AL, APPELLEES
_________________________________
FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 92741-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Michael Scott perfected this appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing
his action against appellees for want of prosecution. The clerk’s record has been filed. As
no evidentiary hearings were conducted before the trial court, there is no reporter’s record.
After granting Scott two extensions of time to file his appellate brief, Scott’s brief was due to be filed by June 5, 2006. Appellant had failed to file a brief by the June 5 deadline. This
court then notified Scott, by letter, that he must file a brief or a response reasonably
explaining his failure to file a brief by June 26, 2006, or the appeal would be subject to
dismissal for want of prosecution. Scott has not filed a brief or a response.
Due to Scott’s failure to comply with the directive of this court, we dismiss the appeal
for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).
MACKEY K. HANCOCK JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Scott v. Warden William Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-scott-v-warden-william-walker-texapp-2006.