Michael Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 30, 2003·No. 03-03-00109-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-03-00109-CR
Michael Scott, Appellant


v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 996378, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant's brief was originally due in this cause on September 2, 2003. His counsel, Mr. Ariel Payan, moved for a six-month extension of time for filing the brief. The motion was granted in part, and the time for filing was extended to November 3, 2003. Counsel has now filed a second motion, asking that the time for filing the brief be extended to February 2, 2004.

In recent months, counsel has regularly failed to meet deadlines for filing his appellate briefs, and he has on several occasions been ordered to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file a brief after being ordered to do so by the Court. One of these show-cause orders is currently pending.

The motion for extension of time is overruled. The district court is ordered to conduct a hearing to determine if counsel has been diligently working on this appeal and when this Court can realistically expect to receive counsel's brief, or whether another lawyer might reasonably be expected to more promptly file a brief on appellant's behalf. A supplemental record from this hearing shall be forwarded to this Court for filing no later than November 21, 2003. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8.

It is ordered October 30, 2003.



Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Patterson

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Scott v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Michael Scott v. State (Michael Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.