Michael Schull v. State
This text of Michael Schull v. State (Michael Schull v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2014
MICHAEL SCHULL, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D14-2406
[August 27, 2014]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-4591CF10A.
Michael Schull, Lake City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(d) (“No successive motions for jail credit will be considered.”)
WARNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Schull v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-schull-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.