Michael S. v. Karen J. K.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Michael S. v. Karen J. K.

269 A.D.2d 878, 703 N.Y.S.2d 799

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 2000·Published

Opinion

—Motion for poor person relief denied. Memorandum: Petitioner has failed to demonstrate the existence of any genuine issue of fact or law that would warrant reversal of Family Court’s order determining that petitioner lacks standing to seek visitation with the child alleged to be his half-sister. Moreover, petitioner cannot make such a showing. This Court has previously held that petitioner’s putative father is collaterally estopped from maintaining a paternity proceeding involving the child with whom petitioner seeks visitation (Matter of Timothy J. T. v Karen J. H., 251 AD2d 1036, appeal dismissed and lv denied 92 NY2d 891). Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Scudder, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion for poor person relief denied. Memorandum: Petitioner has failed to demonstrate the existence of any genuine issue of fact or law that would warrant reversal of Family Court’s order determining that petitioner lacks standing to seek visitation with the child alleged to be his half-sister. Moreover, petitioner cannot make such a showing. This Court has previously held that petitioner’s putative father is collaterally estopped from maintaining a paternity proceeding involving the child with whom petitioner seeks visitation (Matter of Timothy J. T. v Karen J. H., 251 AD2d 1036, appeal dismissed and lv denied 92 NY2d 891). Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Scudder, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Michael S. v. Karen J. K., 269 A.D.2d 878, 703 N.Y.S.2d 799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

269 A.D.2d 878 (Michael S. v. Karen J. K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related