Michael Rufus v. Warden

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 29, 2024
Docket23-6644
StatusUnpublished

This text of Michael Rufus v. Warden (Michael Rufus v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Rufus v. Warden, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6644 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6644

MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00977-PTG-IDD)

Submitted: March 29, 2024 Decided: April 29, 2024

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6644 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Alonza Rufus, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice and denying reconsideration. *

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s orders. See Rufus v. Warden, No. 1:22-cv-00977-PTG-IDD (E.D. Va. May

3, 2023; Nov. 22, 2022); see also Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 793 (2008); Stack v.

Boyle, 342 U.S. 1, 6-7 (1951); Timms v. Johns, 627 F.3d 525, 530-31 (4th Cir. 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Rufus filed the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and motion to reconsider while his appeal of the district court’s criminal judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a prison sentence was pending. We have since affirmed the criminal judgment. See United States v. Rufus, No. 22-2161, 2023 WL 6567886 (4th Cir. Oct. 10, 2023).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stack v. Boyle
342 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1952)
Timms v. Johns
627 F.3d 525 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Rufus v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-rufus-v-warden-ca4-2024.