Michael Robert Tietz v. State
This text of Michael Robert Tietz v. State (Michael Robert Tietz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-11-0357-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
OCTOBER 25, 2011 ______________________________
MICHAEL ROBERT TIETZ, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 2,807-A; HONORABLE DAN L. SCHAAP, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Following an open plea of guilty, Appellant, Michael Robert Tietz, was convicted
of driving while intoxicated, enhanced, and sentenced to six years confinement.
Appellant timely perfected this appeal. The clerk record filed on October 19, 2011,
contains the Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal. However, the certification is not signed by Appellant as required by Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure.1
Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for
further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means
necessary to secure a proper Certification of Defendant=s Right of Appeal in compliance
with Rule 25.2(d). Once properly completed and executed, the certification shall be
included in a supplemental clerk=s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2). The trial
court shall cause this supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court
by November 30, 2011. This order constitutes notice to all parties, pursuant to Rule 37.1
of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, of the defective certification. If a
supplemental clerk=s record containing a proper certification is not filed in accordance
with this order, this matter will be referred to the Court for dismissal. See Tex. R. App.
P. 25.2(d).
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
1 We note that the signature line for counsel is also blank.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Robert Tietz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-robert-tietz-v-state-texapp-2011.