Michael Robert Tietz v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 25, 2011
Docket07-11-00357-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Robert Tietz v. State (Michael Robert Tietz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Robert Tietz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NO. 07-11-0357-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

OCTOBER 25, 2011 ______________________________

MICHAEL ROBERT TIETZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 2,807-A; HONORABLE DAN L. SCHAAP, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Following an open plea of guilty, Appellant, Michael Robert Tietz, was convicted

of driving while intoxicated, enhanced, and sentenced to six years confinement.

Appellant timely perfected this appeal. The clerk record filed on October 19, 2011,

contains the Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal. However, the certification is not signed by Appellant as required by Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure.1

Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for

further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means

necessary to secure a proper Certification of Defendant=s Right of Appeal in compliance

with Rule 25.2(d). Once properly completed and executed, the certification shall be

included in a supplemental clerk=s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2). The trial

court shall cause this supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court

by November 30, 2011. This order constitutes notice to all parties, pursuant to Rule 37.1

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, of the defective certification. If a

supplemental clerk=s record containing a proper certification is not filed in accordance

with this order, this matter will be referred to the Court for dismissal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 25.2(d).

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

1 We note that the signature line for counsel is also blank.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Robert Tietz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-robert-tietz-v-state-texapp-2011.