Michael Riggs v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., and the Shipping Corporation of India
35 F.3d 1466, 1995 A.M.C. 210, 94 Daily Journal DAR 13756, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7477, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27357, 1994 WL 529508
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 30, 1994·No. 92-55139·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The Supreme Court vacated our opinion, reprinted at 8 F.3d 1442, and remanded the case to this court for further consideration in light of Howlett v. Birkdale Shipping Co., S.A., — U.S. —, —, 114 S.Ct. 2057, 2064, 129 L.Ed.2d 78 (1994). Accordingly, consistent with the Howlett decision, we now affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the vessel. The district court’s decision is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Riggs v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., and the Shipping Corporation of India, 35 F.3d 1466, 1995 A.M.C. 210, 94 Daily Journal DAR 13756, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7477, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27357, 1994 WL 529508 (9th Cir. 1994).
35 F.3d 1466 (Michael Riggs v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., and the Shipping Corporation of India) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirksey v. Tonghai Maritime
535 F.3d 388 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Clay v. Daiichi Shipping
74 F. Supp. 2d 665 (E.D. Louisiana, 1999)
Manuel v. Cameron Offshore Boats, Inc.
103 F.3d 31 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)