Michael Richard Durham v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 27, 2018
• Docket: 05-17-00561-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Reversed and Remanded, and Opinion Filed June 27, 2018.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00561-CR

MICHAEL RICHARD DURHAM, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006-84383-2016

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Lang Michael Richard Durham appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting him of driving

while intoxicated (D.W.I.), second offense, a class A misdemeanor. The jury found Durham guilty

and the trial court assessed his punishment at forty-five days of confinement. Durham raises two

issues on appeal, arguing: (1) the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress; and (2)

the trial court erred when it allowed the State to disclose to the venire panel he had been previously

convicted of a prior D.W.I. and required the State to prove his prior conviction as an element of

the offense.

A review of the record in this appeal shows that evidence of Durham’s prior conviction

was introduced during the guilt or innocence phase of the trial. After the parties briefed the issues

in this appeal, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued its opinion in Oliva v. State, No. PD- 0398-17, 2018 WL 2329299 (Tex. Crim. App. May 23, 2018). In Oliva, the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals held that “litigation of the prior-conviction allegation” under section 49.09(a) is

a punishment issue. Oliva, 2018 WL 2329299, at *12. In light of that ruling, the portion of

Durham’s second issue, arguing the trial court erred when it required the State to prove his prior

conviction as an element of the offense, is decided in his favor. Accordingly, we need not address

Durham’s remaining arguments on appeal.

The trial court’s judgment is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with

this opinion.

/Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 170561F.U05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

MICHAEL RICHARD DURHAM, On Appeal from the County Court at Law Appellant No. 6, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006-84383-2016. No. 05-17-00561-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices Myers and Stoddart participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is ORDERED that appellee THE STATE OF TEXAS recover its costs of this appeal from appellant MICHAEL RICHARD DURHAM.

Judgment entered this 27th day of June, 2018.

–3–