Michael Reeder v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
This text of 811 F.2d 607 (Michael Reeder v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Michael REEDER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 86-3961.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 29, 1986.
Before JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This appeal has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Appellant in this ongoing habeas corpus action, has appealed from a district court order denying bond and referring the proceeding to the U.S. Magistrate for supervision over pretrial matters, nondispositive motions, and a report and recommendation. Such an order is not a final decision from which an appeal can be taken pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229 (1945).
It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
811 F.2d 607, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 36409, 1986 WL 18543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-reeder-v-southern-ohio-correctional-facili-ca6-1986.