Michael Reece v. Nco Portfolio Management
This text of Michael Reece v. Nco Portfolio Management (Michael Reece v. Nco Portfolio Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-00255-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
MICHAEL REECE, Appellant,
v.
NCO PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Collin County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The parties to this appeal have filed an agreed motion to vacate the judgment of the
trial court and remand this matter to the trial court for further action consistent with the
agreement of the parties. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to
vacate and remand, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See id. The
agreed motion is GRANTED. We set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the
merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with
the agreement of the parties. See id.; TEX . R. APP. P. 43.2(d). Costs will be taxed against
appellant. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax
costs against the appellant.").
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 29th day of May, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Reece v. Nco Portfolio Management, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-reece-v-nco-portfolio-management-texapp-2008.