Michael Ray Trevino v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 3, 2014
Docket07-13-00169-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Ray Trevino v. State (Michael Ray Trevino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Ray Trevino v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No. 07-13-00169-CR

MICHAEL RAY TREVINO, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Appeal from the 140th District Court -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lubbock County, Texas -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trial Court No. 2012-435,442, Honorable Jim Bob Darnell, Presiding

February 3, 2014

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Before bQUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Michael Ray Trevino, appellant, appeals his conviction for aggravated assault. Appellant timely perfected his appeal. The clerk's record was filed on August 30, 2013, and the reporter's record on September 30, 2013. After two requests for extension of time to file appellant's brief, the brief was due January 6, 2014. On January 14, 2014, appellant's counsel was notified by letter that the brief was overdue and that unless appellant's brief was filed on or before January 24, 2014, the appeal would be abated. To date no brief nor extension of time to file the brief has been filed. Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 140th District Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following: 1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. whether appellant is indigent; * whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due to counsel's failure to file a timely appellate brief; and,

4. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of appellant.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by March 5, 2014. If it is determined that appellant is indigent and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new counsel; the name, address and phone number of any new counsel appointed shall be included in the aforementioned findings. Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before March 5, 2014. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Ray Trevino v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-ray-trevino-v-state-texapp-2014.