Michael Ray Grizzle v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 4, 1998·No. 04-98-00169-CR·Published

Opinion



No. 04-98-00169-CR


Michael Ray GRIZZLE,
Appellant


v.


The STATE of Texas,
Appellee


From the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas
Trial Court No. 199-80129-92
Honorable John R. Roach, Judge Presiding


Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 4, 1998

AFFIRMED



Michael Ray Grizzle's court-appointed appellate attorneys filed a brief in which they raise one arguable point of error, but nonetheless conclude that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of the brief and informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

We have reviewed the record along with counsel's brief, and we agree that the appeal is without merit. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.).

KAREN ANGELINI

JUSTICE



DO NOT PUBLISH


Return to
4th Court of Appeals Opinions


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Ray Grizzle v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 1998).

Michael Ray Grizzle v. State (Michael Ray Grizzle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Bruns v. State
924 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Nichols v. State
954 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)