Michael Ray Ferguson v. State
This text of Michael Ray Ferguson v. State (Michael Ray Ferguson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-18-00336-CR
MICHAEL RAY FERGUSON, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the County Court at Law Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. C37620-CR
ORDER
This appeal was placed “at issue” on July 7, 2019. After reviewing the briefs, the
Court learned that one of appellant’s issues challenges the trial court’s ruling on
appellant’s motion to suppress. However, the Court has no transcription of the motion
to suppress as a part of the reporter’s record.
Accordingly, the “at issue” status of this appeal is set aside. The Court Reporter
is ORDERED to supplement the reporter’s record within 21 days from the date of this order with a transcription of the hearing on appellant’s Motion to Suppress which
appears to have occurred on or about May 30, 2018.1
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Order issued and filed January 10, 2020 [RWR]
1 It appears a reporter’s record was prepared but not filed because the briefs of the parties referenced a reporter’s record. Accordingly, this appeal will again be considered “at issue” when the required record is filed unless a party files a motion for additional briefing based on the record filed.
Ferguson v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Ray Ferguson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-ray-ferguson-v-state-texapp-2020.