Michael Puglia v. The Honorable John P. Cotter
Opinion
Michael PUGLIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The Honorable John P. COTTER et al., Defendant-Appellees.
No. 127, Docket 71-1602.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Sept. 27, 1971.
Decided Sept. 27, 1971.
Joseph F. Trotta, New Haven, Conn. (Trotta, Trotta & Trotta, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for appellant.
Robert L. Hirtle, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn. (Robert K. Killian, Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for appellees.
Before LUMBARD, MANSFIELD and OAKES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm in open court on the opinion of Judge Zampano, 333 F.Supp. 940 (D.Conn.1971), except that Judge Oakes limits his concurrence to non-constitutional grounds.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
450 F.2d 1362 (Michael Puglia v. The Honorable John P. Cotter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.