Michael Potts v. Centerpoint Energy Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 27, 2021
Docket01-21-00004-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Potts v. Centerpoint Energy Inc. (Michael Potts v. Centerpoint Energy Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Potts v. Centerpoint Energy Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Opinion issued May 27, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00004-CV ——————————— MICHAEL POTTS, Appellant V. CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2019-05943

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Michael Potts, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see

also Tex. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees

Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158. On

January 26, 2021, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if

appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by February 25,

2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On March 16, 2021,

appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not

submit written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record by April 15, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Guerra, and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Potts v. Centerpoint Energy Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-potts-v-centerpoint-energy-inc-texapp-2021.